ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward III. 1327-1377. BI Esterlin à la tête barbue (17.5mm, 0.82 g, 2h). Dax mint. Struck 1356-circa 1360. +DVX : [?QIT?NI?], crowned and bearded facing head (of leopard?) / [CIVI T?S] AQn SIS, long cross patée; trefoil in first quarter, crowns in second and third quarters, crown and pellet in fourth quarter. SCBC 8071; Elias 71 var.; Duplessy, Féodales 1076 var.; Elias Collection 146 var.; Boudeau –; Poey d`Avant 2801 var. (legend and quarters). VF, crude, brown and green surfaces. An unpublished variety of an extremely rare issue. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
We found 596780 price guide item(s) matching your search
There are 596780 lots that match your search criteria. Subscribe now to get instant access to the full price guide service.
Click here to subscribe- List
- Grid
-
596780 item(s)/page
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward III. 1327-1377. BI Double au leopard sous couronne (19mm, 0.74 g, 10h). + ?D’ R?X : ?nGLI?, large crown above leopard passant left; rosette below / + mOn?TA DVPL?X (rosette), short cross pattée; crowns in first and fourth quarters. SCBC 8080; Elias 92c; Duplessy, Féodales 1092A; Elias Collection 167; Boudeau 500; Poey d`Avant 2895. VF, toned, minor ghosting. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward III. 1327-1377. BI Obole au léopard (13mm, 0.37 g, 10h). Fourth type. + ?D’ · R[?X : ?nGLI]? (annulet and double annulet stops), leopard passant left between two lines; rosette below / + D[VX : ?QIT]?nI? (double annulet stops), short cross pattée; crown in first quarter. SCBC 8097; Elias 111; Duplessy, Féodales 1112; Elias Collection 201; Boudeau –; Poey d`Avant 2883 corr. (incorrect illustration). VF, toned, slightly irregular flan. Very rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection. Ex Monnaies d’Antan 9 (12 May 2011), lot 851.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward III. 1327-1377. BI Double (23mm, 1.42 g, 8h). [+] ?DVV?RDVS : [R?X] (double annulet stops), AGL?/ FRAC in two lines; omega-shaped bar above and below AGLE / + mOn[?T?] DVPL?X, cross calvary fleurée. SCBC 8087; Elias 124; Duplessy, Féodales –; Elias Collection –; Boudeau –; Poey d`Avant –. VF, toned. Well struck. Very rare – apparently the first of this type to be sold at auction. From the Michael Joffre Collection, purchased from Steve Ford.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry of Lancaster. As Earl of Lancaster, 1347-1351. BI Gros tournois à la couronne (24.5mm, 2.54 g, 9h). Bergerac mint. h?n’ COm L? nCE / [BnDICTV ·] SI[T · n O]m [E · DnI · nRI · DE I · IhV · XPI] (annulet stops), long cross pattée; secret marks: lis on serif of L, small B between A and n / + DnS : BRGG?R?CII (double annulet stop), châtel tournois enclosing crown; all within tressure of twelve arches containing leaves. SCBC 8103; Elias 127 var. (legend); Elias, Bergerac 2.1.1-7 var. (same); Duplessy, Féodales 994; Elias Collection 223-5 var. (same); Boudeau –; Poey d`Avant 2700 var. (same). VF, toned, ragged edges. The first A in the mint name is engraved over a G. Extremely rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection.On 24 August 1345, the key strategic town of Bergerac fell to English forces led by Henry of Lancaster, who had recently been appointed Captain-General and Lieutenant in Aquitaine by Edward III. Henry, a cousin of the King, was one of England`s most successful military commanders in the early stages of the Hundred Years War. In 1347, he was rewarded by Edward III with the privilege of striking coins in Bergerac in his own name and enjoying the profit thereof.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Demi gros (24mm, 2.12 g, 4h). First issue. Limoges mint. + ?D’ : PO : Gn’S : REGIS : AnGLI? : L (double rosette stops), half-length figure of Edward right, wearing floral wreath, holding sword over right shoulder and raising left hand in benediction, within tressure of arches / GLA · In · ? XC · D? ?T In · T? RA · PAX/ PRn CPS AQI TAn, long cross pattée, trefoils in quarters. SCBC 8130; Elias 177 var. (obv. legend stops); Duplessy, Féodales 1124; Elias Collection 269; Boudeau 510; Poey d`Avant 2965 var. (same). Near VF, toned, small flan crack. Rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection. Ex Keith Smalley Collection (Spink 219, 24 September 2013), lot 324, purchased from Seaby, July 1978.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Demi gros (24mm, 2.18 g, 12h). First issue. Uncertain mint (Limoges?). + ?D’ : PO : GnS : R?GIS : ?nGLI? : [...] (double rosette stops), half-length figure of Edward right, wearing floral wreath, holding sword over right shoulder and raising left hand in benediction, within tressure of arches / GLI? In ? X[...] ?T In T? R? P?X/ · PRI CPS ?QV T??, long cross pattée, trefoils in quarters. SCBC 8131; cf. Elias 178; Duplessy, Féodales 1124; cf. Elias Collection 270; Boudeau 510; Poey d`Avant –. Near VF, toned, areas of weak strike. Mint letter obscure, likely L. From the Michael Joffre Collection. Ex Monnaies d’Antan 9 (12 May 2011), lot 854.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Demi gros (25mm, 2.09 g, 8h). First issue. Poitiers mint. + ?D’ : PO : Gn’S : REGIS : AnGLI? : P (double annulet stops), half-length figure of Edward right, wearing floral wreath, holding sword over right shoulder and raising left hand in benediction, within tressure of arches / GLA In · ? XLC · D? ?T In · T? RA · PAX/ PRn CPS AQI TAn, long cross pattée, trefoils in quarters. SCBC 8130; Elias 179b; Duplessy, Féodales 1124; Elias Collection –; Boudeau 510; Poey d`Avant 2985. Good VF, light cleaning scratches in fields, test cut on edge. Strong portrait. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Demi gros (23.5mm, 2.24 g, 1h). First issue. La Rochelle mint. + ?D’ P’mO : G?NIT : REGI : ?nGLI?, half-length figure of Edward right, wearing floral wreath, holding sword over right shoulder and raising left hand in benediction, within tressure of arches / GL? · In ? XLIS · DO ?T · In · TR ? · P?X · R/ · PRn CPS ?QV T?n, long cross pattée, trefoils in quarters. SCBC 8130; Elias 181a; Duplessy, Féodales 1124; cf. Elias Collection 275; Boudeau 510; Poey d`Avant –. VF, toned. Rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Demi gros (24mm, 1.57 g, 7h). First issue. Tarbes mint. + : ?D’ : PO : GnS : R?G : ?nGLI : PnCP : T (double pellet-in-annulet stops), half-length figure of Edward right, wearing floral wreath, holding sword over right shoulder and raising left hand in benediction, within tressure of arches / GLI? : In XC?LCIS D?O : ? In TR? : P?/ PRn CPS ?QI T?n, long cross pattée, trefoils in quarters. SCBC 8130; Elias 183; Duplessy, Féodales 1124; Elias Collection –; Boudeau 510; Poey d`Avant –. Good VF, toned, minor areas of weakness. Extremely rare – only the second known, with none known to Elias, the other in private hands. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Demi gros (23mm, 2.35 g, 2h). First issue. + ?DVV?RDVS : PRImO : G?NTV (double pellet-in-annulet stops), half-length figure of Edward right, holding sword over right shoulder and raising left hand in benediction, within tressure of arches / GLI? : In XCELCIS D?O : ? In TR? : P?/ PRn CPS ?QI T?n (double pellet-in-annulet stops), long cross pattée, trefoils in quarters. SCBC 8130; Elias 185a var. (legend stops); Duplessy, Féodales 1124; Elias Collection –; Boudeau 510; Poey d`Avant –. VF, toned. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Esterlin – Sterling (18.5mm, 1.07 g, 12h). First issue. + ?D PO G?nI P R?GI AnGL, half-length figure of Edward right, wearing floral wreath. holding sword over right shoulder and raising left hand in benediction / PRn CPS AQI TAn (double annulet stop), long cross pattée, trefoils with additional pellets in quarters. SCBC 8132; Elias 199 var. (no extra pellets); Duplessy, Féodales 1125A; Elias Collection 299 var. (same); Boudeau 511; Poey d`Avant –. Good VF, toned. Rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Hardi d’argent (18mm, 1.01 g, 4h). Bordeaux mint. ?D : PO : GnS R?G : ?GL · B, half-length figure of Edward facing beneath Gothic canopy, holding sword in right hand and raising left in benediction / · PRn CPS · ?QIT ?nI? (rosette stops), long cross pattée; lis in first and fourth quarters, leopard in second and third. SCBC 8134; Elias 202; Duplessy, Féodales 1126; Elias Collection 307a; Boudeau 513; cf. Poey d`Avant 2950-3. VF, toned, ghosting. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Hardi d’argent (19mm, 1.17 g, 4h). Limoges mint. ?D PO GIR ?G · ?G? L, half-length figure of Edward facing beneath Gothic canopy, holding sword in right hand and raising left in benediction / · PRI CPS · ?QT ?n? (rosette stops), long cross pattée; lis in first and fourth quarters, leopard in second and third. SCBC 8134; Elias 204; Duplessy, Féodales 1126; Elias Collection 310; Boudeau 513; Poey d`Avant 2978. VF, toned, area of weakness on face, ghosting. Struck on a broad flan. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Hardi d’argent (19mm, 1.00 g, 4h). Poitiers mint. ?D PO G?nT R?GI ?G?, half-length figure of Edward facing beneath Gothic canopy, holding sword in right hand and raising left in benediction / PRn CPS ?QPI T?n, long cross pattée; lis in first and fourth quarters, leopard in second and third. SCBC 8134; Elias 205b; Duplessy, Féodales 1126; Elias Collection 313; Boudeau 513; Poey d`Avant 3006. VF, toned, slightly ragged flan. Rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Hardi d’argent (18mm, 1.14 g, 1h). La Rochelle mint. ?D : PO : GnS R?G : ?GLI?, half-length figure of Edward facing beneath Gothic canopy, holding sword in right hand and raising left in benediction / · PRn CPS · R ?QIT ?nI? (rosette stops), long cross pattée; lis in first and fourth quarters, leopard in second and third. SCBC 8134; Elias 206a; Duplessy, Féodales 1126; Elias Collection 314; Boudeau 513; Poey d`Avant 3056. Good VF, toned. From the Michael Joffre Collection. Ex Classical Numismatic Group 61 (25 September 2002), lot 2694 (part of).
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. AR Hardi d’argent (19.5mm, 1.05 g, 3h). ?D PO · GnS · R ?GI · ?GI?, half-length figure of Edward facing beneath Gothic canopy, holding sword in right hand and raising left in benediction / · PRn CPS · ?QI ?n? (rosette stops), long cross pattée; lis in first and fourth quarters, leopard in second and third. SCBC 8134; Elias 208a; Duplessy, Féodales 1126; Elias Collection 317; Boudeau 513; cf. Poey d`Avant 3095. VF, toned. Attractive portrait. Rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection. Ex Classical Numismatic Group 61 (25 September 2002), lot 2694 (part of).
ANGLO-GALLIC. Edward the Black Prince. As Prince of Aquitaine, 1362-1372. BI Denier (18mm, 0.79 g, 10h). Limoges mint. + ?D · PO · GnS · R?GI · ?nGLI? · L, plain short cross; lis in first and fourth quarters, leopard in second and third / + PRnCPS · ?QVITANI? · L (rosette stops), short cross pattée. SCBC 8139; Elias 219; Duplessy, Féodales 1131; cf. Elias Collection 332-3; Boudeau –; Poey d`Avant –. VF, roughness. Rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection. Ex Monnaies d’Antan 9 (12 May 2011), lot 859.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Richard II. 1377-1399. AR Hardi d’argent (17.5mm, 0.88 g, 7h). RIC?RD’ RX · ?GL?, crowned half-length facing bust of Richard in arch / · FR?C I? · Dn S · ?QI T?n?, long cross pattée; leopard in first and fourth quarters, lis in second and third. SCBC 8143; Elias 228; Duplessy, Féodales 1136; Elias Collection 337; Boudeau 515; Poey d`Avant 3105. VF, toned. From the Michael Joffre Collection. Ex Classical Numismatic Group 61 (25 September 2002), lot 2694 (part of).
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry IV-VI. 1399-1461. AR Double hardi d’argent (24mm, 1.95 g, 5h). + ?nRICVS · R?X · ?nGLI? (annulet stops), crowned half-length facing bust of Henry in arch; annulet over crown / FR?nC I? · D nS · ?QI T?nI (annulet stops), long cross pattée; leopard in first and fourth quarters, lis in second and third. SCBC 8146; Elias 232; Duplessy, Féodales 1139; Elias Collection 341 (this coin); Boudeau –; cf. Poey d`Avant 3115 (Henry IV). Fine/VF, toned. Very rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection, purchased from Steve Ford. Ex Finn FPL 16 (1999), no. 512; E.R. Duncan Elias Collection (Spink 77, 21 June 1990), lot 341, purchased from de Mey, 1978.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry IV-VI. 1399-1461. AR Hardi d’argent (17mm, 1.16 g, 8h). ?’RIC’ R X ?GL?, crowned half-length facing bust of Henry in arch; annulet over crown / FR? CI? DnS ?QI T?nI, long cross pattée; leopard in first and fourth quarters, lis and annulets in second and third. SCBC 8147; Elias 233e; Duplessy, Féodales 1140; Elias Collection –; Boudeau 517 (Henry IV); Poey d`Avant 3120 (Henry IV). Good VF. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry IV-VI. 1399-1461. AR Hardi d’argent (19mm, 1.27 g, 8h). ?’RIC’ R X ?GLI?, crowned half-length facing bust of Henry in arch; annulet over crown / FR? CI? DnS ?QI T?nI, long cross pattée; leopard in first and fourth quarters, lis and annulets in second and third. SCBC 8147; Elias 233e; Duplessy, Féodales 1140; Elias Collection –; Boudeau 517 (Henry IV); Poey d`Avant 3120 (Henry IV). VF, toned, ghosting. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry IV-VI. 1399-1461. AR Hardi d’argent (19mm, 0.95 g, 3h). ?’RIC’ R · ?GL?, crowned half-length facing bust of Henry in arch; mullet over crown / FR? CI? DnS ?QI T?nI, long cross pattée; leopard in first and fourth quarters, lis and annulets in second and third. SCBC 8147; Elias 233f; Duplessy, Féodales 1140; Elias Collection 345; Boudeau 517 (Henry IV); Poey d`Avant –. VF, toned, ghosting. Rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry IV-VI. 1399-1461. AR Hardi d’argent (18.5mm, 0.73 g, 10h). Contemporary imitation. h?RIC R ?nGL?, crowned half-length facing bust of Henry in arch; [annulet over crown?] / FR? CI? · DnS ?QI T?nI (rosette stop), long cross pattée; leopard and pellet in first and fourth quarters, lis and pellet in second and third. SCBC 8147; cf. Elias 233; cf. Duplessy, Féodales 1140; Elias Collection –; cf. Boudeau 517 (Henry IV); cf. Poey d`Avant 3117. Fine. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry V. 1413-1422. AR Florette (24mm, 2.86 g, 4h). Rouen mint; im: pellet under 16th/15th letters. First issue, authorized 14 January 1419. + h?nRICVS : FRA?CORV : R?X (triple pellet stops), crown over three lis / + SIT : nOn? : DnI : B???DICTV (triple pellet stops), cross fleurée; crown in first quarter, leopard in fourth. SCBC 8156; Elias 246b; Elias Collection 358; Duplessey 435; Ciani 589; Lafaurie 439. VF, toned. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry V. 1413-1422. AR Florette (24mm, 2.56 g, 2h). Rouen mint; im: leopard, annulets under first letters. Fourth issue, authorized 16 June 1420. (leopard) h : R?X : A?GLI? : Z : h?R?S : FRA?CI (triple pellet stops), crown over three lis flanked by rampant lions / (leopard) SIT : nOn? : DnI : B[???DICT]V (triple pellet stops, retrograde S), cross fleurée; crown in first quarter, leopard in fourth. SCBC 8159; Elias 249a; Elias Collection 362 (this coin); Duplessey 435C; Ciani 591; Lafaurie 439 var. (no leopard). Fine, toned. Rare. From the Michael Joffre Collection, purchased from Steve Ford. Ex E.R. Duncan Elias Collection (Spink 77, 21 June 1990), lot 362, purchased from Vandercammen, 1974.
ANGLO-GALLIC. Henry V. 1413-1422. BI Niquet ou léopard (22mm, 1.81 g, 3h). Rouen mint; im: pellets under first letters. Authorized 30 November 1421. + h : R?X : A?GL : h?R?S : FRA?C (triple pellet stops), crowned leopard passant left; fleur-dei-lis above / + SIT : nOm? : [DnI : B???D]ICTV (triple pellet stops), large cross pattée; h at center; trefoils in angles. SCBC 8162; Elias 260; Elias Collection 367; Duplessey 441; Ciani 593; Lafaurie 445. Good Fine. From the Michael Joffre Collection.
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. All coins: Æ Reduced Folles of Constantine I from various mints, mostly eastern. Lot also includes folles of Licinius I (10) and Licinius II (4). Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. All coins: Æ Reduced Folles of Constantine I from various mints, mostly eastern. Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. All coins: Æ Reduced Folles of Constantine I from various mints, mostly eastern. Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. Includes: Æ Reduced Folles of Constantine I and Constantine II from various mints, mostly eastern. Lot also includes thirty-three (33) folles of Delmatius. Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. Includes: Æ Reduced Folles of Constantine II and Constans from various mints, mostly eastern. Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. All coins: Æ Reduced Folles of Constans from various mints, mostly eastern. Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. Includes: Æ Reduced Folles of Constans and Constantius II from various mints, mostly eastern. Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. All coins: Æ Reduced Folles of Constantius II from various mints, mostly eastern. Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of six hundred forty-five (645) Constantinian Era Æ. Includes: Æ Reduced Folles of Constantius II from various mints, mostly eastern, as well as a large number of unidentified contemporary issues. Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Six hundred forty-five (645) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
ROMAN. Imperial. Lot of seven hundred forty-three (743) Constantinian Era Æ. All coins: Æ Reduced Folles of Constantius II from various mints, mostly eastern, as well as a large number of unidentified contemporary issues. Lot also includes three Alexandria mint provincial Æ (dichalkon of Domtian ad one tetradrachm each of Philip I and Claudius II Gothicus, as well as a Mamluk dirham (not part of the hoard). Fair-VF with brown patina. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Seven hundred forty-three (747) coins in lot. Sold on behalf of the Royal Ontario Museum. Ex 1903/5 Ihnasyah Hoard. Each individual coin comes in an archival flip and has its own ticket containing museum inventory number and pedigree information.Prior to the opening of the Royal Ontario Museum in 1912, the first Director of Archaeology, Dr. C.T. Currelly, purchased in Egypt a large hoard, or portion of a hoard, of Constantinian bronze coins, which were to form the nucleus of the Museum`s collections. Containing coins datable from the period immediately following the Battle of Chrysopolis in AD 324 all the way to AD 346, the hoard, discovered, in 1903 or shortly before its sale, was purchased in 1905 at Ihnasyah in the Fayyum. Examined by J.G. Milne, the hoard, along with Milne`s analysis, was published in 1914 in the Journal International d`Archeologie Numismatique. Totaling more than 6000 coins, the hoard included some coins from other periods, which made their way into the hoard at the time of the sale, since their patination is different from the rest of the hoard. In 1965, Frederick H. Armstrong published a revisiting of the hoard (Phoenix 19 [1965]), revising and amending the earlier work of Milne, and noting varieties missed in the earlier study prior to the publication of Late Roman Bronze Coinage.For pdfs of Milne’s original publication of the hoard and Armstrong’s supplementary study, as well as a listing of the inventory numbers of the hoard, see http://www.cngcoins/rom
UNCERTAIN EAST, Uncertain mint in the Kabul Valley. Circa 5th century BC. AR Half Stater – Siglos(?) (22mm, 5.75 g). Indistinct type / Crowned goat recumbent left, head right; zig-zag pattern (or letter?) below; c/m: uncertain design in incuse circle. Caboul Hoard Groupe 2, 36 = ATEC 2057 = Sunrise 144 (this coin). VF, toned, minor hairline edge splits, traces of hard green deposits. Unique for denomination. From the Sunrise Collection. Ex Cabul 1933 Hoard (IGCH 1830).This coin is from the first issue of coinage struck in the eastern region of the Achaemenid Empire. The exact location of the mint remains unknown, though analysis of the Cabul hoard suggests they originated from a mint in the Kabul Valley.
INDIA, Kushan Empire. Vima Kadphises. Circa AD 100-127/8. Set of Four AV 2 Dinars. Mint I (A). 3rd emission. All coins: BACI??YC OH MO KA?FICHC, diademed and crowned figure or half-length bust of Vima Kadphises in various poses, holding mace-scepter or laurel branch in right hand; flames at shoulder, tamgha to right or left / Maharajasa rajadirajasa sarvaloga isvarasa mahisvarasa hima kaphthisasa tradara(sa) in Karosthi script, ithyphallic Siva standing facing, head left, holding trident in right hand and resting left arm on bull Nandi behind, who is standing right with head facing; Buddhist triratana (“Three Jewels”) to left. Lot includes the following: (a) (24mm, 15.96 g, 12h). Bopearachchi, Premiers Série VIII, 12-17; MK 10 (dies 1/– [unlisted rev. die]); Donum Burns 75; Sunrise 522 (this coin) // (b) (25mm, 15.94 g, 12h). Bopearachchi, Premiers Série IX, 22 (this coin); MK 11 (dies 1/– [unlisted rev. die]); Donum Burns 76; Sunrise 523 (this coin) // (c) (23mm, 15.89 g, 12h). Bopearachchi, Premiers Série X, 24 (this coin); MK 12 (dies 4/12A); Donum Burns 78; Sunrise 524 (this coin) // (d) (24mm, 15.91 g, 12h). Bopearachchi, Premiers Série XI, 29; MK 13 (dies 3/– [unlisted rev. die]); Donum Burns –; Sunrise 525 (this coin). All coins Superb EF, a couple light scratches in field on reverse of coin (a). From the Sunrise Collection, purchased from Classical Numismatic Group, 2007.The name Kushan derives from the Chinese term Guishuang, used to describe one branch of the Yuezhi, a loose confederation of Indo-European people who had been living in the Xinjiang Province of modern China. Driven west by Xiongnu between 176 and 160 BC, the five groups of the Yuezhi – the Xiumi, Guishuang (Kushans), Shuangmi, Xidun, and Dumi – reached the Hellenic kingdom of Baktria by 135 BC. They expelled the ruling Greek dynasties there, forcing these kings further south to settle along the Indus River. In the following century, the Guishuang forced the other tribes of the Yuezhi into a tight confederation. Now, as the Guishuang was the predominant power, the entire group became known by that name. This appellation was Westernized as Kushan, though the Chinese still referred to them as Yuezhi.Like the Hellenistic Greeks and Romans, the Kushans were a multi-cultural society, incorporating much of the cultures they ruled into their own. Like their Baktrian predeccesors, early Kushan coins used Greek legends on the obverse, along with a translation in the local Karosthi script on the reverse. Beginning with Kanishka I, however, the Kushan language, written in an adaptation of the Greek alphabet with some local alterations, was used almost exclusively. From the time of Vima Taktu (Soter Megas), the Kushans also began to adopt Indian cultural elements. Embracing a wide variety of local Indian and Central Asian deities, they assimilated them with Greco-Roman types already prevalent in the region. Overall, the Kushan pantheon represented a religious and artistic syncretism of western and eastern elements.An adept military leader who expanded Kushan power throughout much of Central Asia, Vima Kadphises was the first Kushan ruler to send a diplomatic mission to Rome, during the reign of Trajan. Vima Kadphises was also the first Kushan ruler to strike gold coins. Because the Kushans under his reign had extended their protective control over the Silk Road, the Roman gold they obtained through the trading of luxury items with the Roman Empire–such as silk, spices, and other exotic goods–provided the metal for the striking of the first Indian gold coins. In addition to the existing copper and silver denominations, Vima Kadphises introduced three gold denomination
IBERIA, Punic Iberia. Circa 237-209 BC. AR Shekel (19.5mm, 7.26 g, 11h). Diademed male head (Hamilcar?) left / Prow right; below, dolphin right. MHC 15–9 var. (unlisted dies); ACIP 543; SNG BM Spain 91; SNG Copenhagen Supp. 1332; SNG Lorichs –; MHBNF –. Good VF, toned, areas of weak strike. Rare. The distinguished career of Hamilcar Barca, as commander of the Carthaginian fleet during the First Punic War, was temporarily interrupted after his defeat at the hands of Rome off Lilybaeum in 241. The peace terms he negotiated allowed him to withdraw his troops to Africa on the agreement that Carthage abandon all claims to Sardinia and Sicily, refrain from sailing her warships in Italian waters, and pay an indemnity of 3,200 talents. The Carthaginian oligarchy soon showed more interest in expanding into Africa and Spain and reappointed Hamilcar as commander-in-chief. In 237, after putting down the revolts of Spendius and Matho in northern Africa, he was sent to Iberia with his young son, Hannibal. Based at Gades, he conquered southern and eastern Iberia, advanced the frontier to Cape Nao, and built a fortress at Acra Leuce (Alicante). Responding to a Roman protest in 231 that was prompted by Massalia, he replied that his conquest was necessary to secure manpower, mineral wealth, and money to pay his country’s war indemnity to Rome. In 229 he fell in battle against native Iberians at Helice (Elche), leaving his three sons, Hannibal, Hasdrubal, and Mago to face Rome once again.
CARTHAGE, First Punic War. Circa 264-241 BC. BI Trishekel (30.5mm, 18.82 g, 12h). Reduced standard. Head of Tanit left, wearing wreath of grain ears, triple-pendant earring, and necklace with pendants / Horse standing right; palm tree in background. MAA 43; CNP 161; Müller, Afrique 100; SNG Copenhagen 189 var. (pellets); SNG Lloyd –; Basel –; Gulbenkian –; de Luynes 3773. Near EF, toned, light marks. Very rare. Ex Georges Bouchereau & Robert Boyer Collection.The trishekel was the largest silver denomination struck in Carthage (although of billon quality), and was used for only three issues, all during the First Punic War: one with palm and horse, the other two with uraeus and horse.
THRACO-MACEDONIAN TRIBES, Bisaltai. Circa 475-465 BC. AR Oktadrachm (33mm, 28.68 g). Horse walking right, bridle held by nude warrior in background, walking right, wearing petasos and holding two spears, CISA-LTIKON (partially retrograde or inverted) around / Quadripartite incuse square. Peykov A3060 (this coin illustrated); Topalov 33; HPM pl. XI, 5-6 var. (breaks in ethnic); AMNG III/2, 4 var. (same); SNG ANS –; SNG Ashmolean 2242 var. (same). Superb EF, lightly toned. Boldly struck on excellent metal. Ex Mieza Collection (Nomos 7, 15 May 2013), lot 33; Triton XI (8 January 2008), lot 100.The Bisaltai were a tribe of Pelasgian or Thracian origin and occupied the territory between the rivers Echedoros and Strymon, including the metalliferous mountains which separate the territory of the Bisaltai from the territory of the Krestonioi and Mygonia on the west (Hdt. 7.115). At the time of the invasion of Xerxes in 480 BC, the Bisaltai were governed by a Thracian ruler who was independent of Macedonian influence, and refused to assist the Great King of Persia when his army crossed Thrace to invade mainland Greece. At some point after the Persian retreat, Alexander I of Macedon, who was in the service of Persians as early as 492 BC, annexed the territory as far as the Strymon Valley. Capturing its rich silver mines, he issued the first regal Macedonian coinage, which is indistinguishable from the Bisaltian but for the placing of his own name. The absence of Bisaltai oktadrachms in the Asyut hoard led Price and Waggoner to suggest a mintage date of circa 475-465 BC. This coinage was terminated about the same time as the disaster at Drabeskos in 465/4 BC, in which the Athenian colonists of Ennea Hodoi (later Amphipolis) were exterminated by the native Thracians, though it is unknown whether this coinage is directly related to the Bisaltai’s involvement in this conflict.
THRACO-MACEDONIAN REGION, Siris. Circa 525-480 BC. AR Stater (18.5mm, 10.03 g). Ithyphallic satyr standing right, hands placed on hips, confronting nymph standing right, raising right hand in protest, her left hand placed forward in a plea-like gesture; three pellets around / Rough incuse square divided diagonally. Smith Group 2 (Lete); Peykov A0070; HPM pl. VII, 4; AMNG III/2, 11 (Lete); SNG ANS –; Traité I 1563 (Lete); Pozzi 686 = Pozzi (Boutin) 1436 (this coin). Superb EF. Very rare variety with satryr’s hands on hips. A masterpiece of late archaic art. Ex Numismatica Genevensis SA 5 (2 December 2008), lot 60 (hammer 130,000 CHF); Leu 36 (7 May 1985), lot 99; Prof. Samuel-Jean Pozzi Collection (Naville I, 14 March 1921), lot 686.The satyr and nymph type is one of the more widely occurring designs in early Thraco-Macedonian coinage. Variations of this type were used at mints from Siris in the northwest to Thasos in the southeast. Similarly, tribes in this region – the Dionysioi, Laiai, Letai, Orreskii, Pernaioi, and Zaielioi – also used this type. They often included their respective ethnic, and some of these tribes replace the satyr with a centaur. Based on the positioning of the figures, there are two major divisions of the satyr-nymph type. The first group, struck primarily at Thasos, shows the nymph held in the arms of the satryr, who carries her off to the right. The other group, struck primarily at Siris, shows the nymph confronted by the satyr. In both cases the appearance of the figures is largely the same: the satyr is presented nude and ithyphallic, while the nymph is dressed in a long chiton with the skirt divided into many long strands. The iconographic difference between the groups is the appearance of the lower body of the satyr. On the first group, the satyr has the normal legs and feet of a man, while on the second group, in addition to a tail, the satyr has the legs and hooves of a goat. Overall, the artistic style of the scene is wonderfully archaic, and evident not only in the posture of the figures, but also in its minute details. While most of the mints ceased production after about 480/470 BC, Thasos continued to use the type for some time, allowing the scene to transition through the archaic phase, finally taking on a lovely early Classical style by the time production of the type ended there circa 404 BC.The satyr/centaur and nymph type represents a common theme in Greek mythology: the juxtaposition of the wildly monstrous and sexually-charged with the civilized. Kraay`s view (ACGC pp. 148-9) that the coins where the satyr and nymph are both standing show the nymph seducing the satyr, while the coins where the nymph is in the satyr`s arms show the nymph is protesting her being carried off, is contradicted by a close inspection of the coins themselves. In similar scenes of this event depicted elsewhere, the satyr clearly manhandles the nymph, forcibly grasping one of her arms, while the nymph appears in a posture of apparent flight (see, e.g., HPM pl. VII-VIII). Clearly, in both scenes the nymph is protesting the actions of the satyr or centaur, who, in the role of the wild, libidinous creature that he is, is seizing the nymph for his own purposes, driven by his sexual arousal.
THRACO-MACEDONIAN REGION, Siris. Circa 525-480 BC. AR Stater (21mm, 9.90 g). Ithyphallic satyr standing right, right hand grasping right wrist of nymph fleeing right, his left hand supporting her chin; three pellets around / Rough incuse square divided diagonally. Smith Group 5 (Lete); Peykov A0020; HPM pl. VIII, 4; AMNG III/2, 14 (Lete); SNG ANS 954–61 (“Lete”); Kunstfreund 40 (Uncertain mint); Traité I 1568 (Lete). Superb EF, beautifully toned. Excellent metal. Ex LHS 100 (23 April 2007), lot 211; Leu 38 (13 May 1986), lot 58.The satyr and nymph type is one of the more widely occurring designs in early Thraco-Macedonian region. Variations of this type were used at mints from Siris in the northwest to Thasos in the southeast. Similarly, tribes in this region - the Dionysioi, Laiai, Letai, Orreskii, Pernaioi, and Zaielioi - also used this type. They often included their respective ethnic, although some of these tribes replace the satyr with a centaur. Based on the positioning of the figures, there are two major divisions of the satyr-nymph type. The first group, struck primarily at Thasos, shows the nymph held in the arms of the satryr, who carries her off to the right. The other group, struck primarily at Siris, shows the nymph confronted by the satyr. In both cases the appearance of the figures is largely the same: the satyr is presented nude and ithyphallic, while the nymph is dressed in a long chiton with the skirt divided into many long strands. The only stylistic difference between the groups is the appearance of the lower body of the satyr. On the first group, the satyr has the normal legs and feet of a man, while on the second group, in addition to a tail, the satyr has the legs and hooves of a goat. Overall, the artistic style of the scene is wonderfully archaic, and evident not only in the posture of the figures, but also in its minute details. While most of the mints ceased production after about 480/470 BC, Thasos continued to use the type for some time, allowing the scene to transition through an "archaized" phase, and finally taking on a lovely early Classical style by the time production of the type ended there circa 404 BC.The satyr/centaur and nymph type represents a common theme in Greek mythology: the juxtaposition of the wildly monstrous and sexually-charged with the human. Kraay`s view (ACGC pp. 148-9) that the coins where the satyr and nymph are both standing show the nymph seducing the satyr, while the coins where the nymph is in the satyr`s arms show the nymph is protesting her being carried off, is contradicted by a close inspection of the coins themselves. In similar scenes of this event depicted elsewhere, the satyr clearly manhandles the nymph, forcibly grasping one of her arms, while the nymph appears in a posture of apparent flight (see, e.g., HPM pl. VII-VIII). Clearly, in both scenes the nymph is protesting the actions of the satyr or centaur, who, in the role of the wild, libidinous creature that he is, is seizing the nymph for his own purposes, driven by his sexual arousal.
MACEDON (Roman Protectorate), Republican period. First Meris. Circa 167-149 BC. AR Tetradrachm (31mm, 17.01 g, 9h). Amphipolis mint. Diademed and draped bust of Artemis right, bow and quiver over shoulder, in the center of a Macedonian shield / Club; AP monogram and MAKE?ONON above, ?POTHS below; all within oak wreath, thunderbolt to left. Prokopov, Silver 178 (O48/R150); SNG Copenhagen 1310–1; SNG Dreer 646–7 (same obv. die); SNG Manchester 748 (same obv. die); Triton VIII, lot 203 (same dies). EF, beautiful even light gray toning with peripheral iridescence, a couple minor die breaks. From the collection of a Southern Pathologist, purchased from C. H. Wolfe, 3 June 1988.
CIMMERIAN BOSPOROS, Pantikapaion. Circa 325-310 BC. AV Stater (22mm, 9.11 g, 11h). Head of Pan left, wearing ivy wreath / Griffin, holding spear in its mouth, standing left, head facing, forepaw raised, on grain ear; ?-A-N around. MacDonald 63; Anokhin 1027; HGC 7, 21; SNG BM Black Sea 867; Gulbenkian 589; Hunt I 95; Kraay & Hirmer 440. Superb EF, fully lustrous. Fine style. Ex Nomos 6 (8 May 2012), lot 41 (hammer CHF 140,000); Numismatica Genevensis SA VI (30 November 2010), lot 41; Triton XIII (5 January 2010), lot 168 (hammer $95,000).Pantikapaion was founded by Greek colonists from Miletos in the late seventh century BC. Situated on the west side of the Cimmerian Bosporos, in what is now called the Crimea, it achieved great prosperity through its exploitation of the abundant fisheries of the straits and the export of wheat from the Crimea. This wealth is attested by its splendid gold coinage which commenced in the mid-4th century BC and by the magnificently furnished rock tombs of its principal citizens in the same period. Later, it was to become a regional capital of the kingdom of Mithradates VI of Pontos (120-63 BC) and later still the seat of the kings of Bosporos (first century BC - fourth century AD). The coinage of Pantikapaion seems to have commenced with silver issues in the latter part of the fifth century BC, but it is for its beautiful gold staters that the mint is chiefly noted. They depict the head of the god Pan (a pun on the name of the city) and on the reverse the griffin that Herodotos describes as being the guardian of the remote sources of gold.
KINGS of BOSPOROS. Pharnakes II. Circa 63-46 BC. AV Stater (21mm, 8.23 g, 12h). Pantikapaion mint. Dated BE 243 (52/1 BC). Diademed head right / BASI?EOS BASI?EON MEGA?OY FAPNAKOY, Apollo seated left, holding laurel branch in extended right hand, left arm resting on kithara to right; tripod to left, GMS (date) to right. Frolova & Ireland § 5, dies A/a = G&K 1 = de Luynes 2396 (same dies); Anokhin 1301; MacDonald 182; HGC 7, 198; DCA 446; Triton XII, lot 266 (same dies). EF, a few light marks. Extremely rare first issue of staters, one of only three known, the other two being the de Luynes (BN) and Triton XII pieces. At the time of Frolova & Ireland’s publication (2002), there were 16 known specimens of Pharnakes’ gold staters (plus three forgeries). Twelve specimens have since appeared at auction, bringing the known population of these very rare pieces to 28, of which about 10 are in museums. The present coin is one of only two examples of the first year of issue available in the marketplace.Pharnakes was awarded the Bosporan Kingdom by Pompey for the betrayal of Pharnakes’ father Mithradates VI, King of Pontos. Little is known of Pharnakes’ sixteen-year reign except for its ending. During the Civil War between Pompey and Julius Caesar, Pharnakes tried to recapture his father`s former territories in Pontos. He won a victory over Caesar`s general, Domitius Calvinus, and ordered Romans in the region castrated or put to the sword. In response, Caesar launched a rapid five day war against Pharnakes in 47 BC, culminating in the battle of Zela. Caesar emerged victorious, prompting him to report back to the Senate with the now famous dictum, "Veni, Vidi, Vici" (I came, I saw, I conquered).
KINGS of PONTOS. Mithradates VI Eupator. Circa 120-63 BC. AV Stater (19mm, 8.24 g, 1h). First Mithradatic War issue. In the name and types of Lysimachos of Thrace. Istros mint. Struck circa 88-86 BC. Diademed head of the deified Alexander right, with horn of Ammon / BASI?EOS ?YSIMAXOY, Athena Nikephoros seated left, left arm resting on shield, spear diagonally in background; ?? to inner left, IS on throne; in exergue, ornate trident left. Callataÿ p. 139, dies D1/R1; AMNG I 482; SNG Copenhagen (Thrace) 1094 (same dies); McClean 4481 (Thrace; same dies). EF. From the collection of the MoneyMuseum, Zurich. Acquired from Leu, July 1999.
KINGS of PONTOS. Mithradates VI Eupator. Circa 120-63 BC. AV Stater (19.5mm, 8.29 g, 12h). First Mithradatic War issue. In the name and types of Lysimachos of Thrace. Kallatis mint. Struck circa 88-86 BC. Diademed head of the deified Alexander right, with horn of Ammon / BASI?EO[S] ?YSIMAXOY, Athena Nikephoros seated left, left arm resting on shield, spear diagonally in background; HP monogram to inner left, KA? on throne; in exergue, ornate trident left. Callataÿ p. 140, dies D5/R4; AMNG I 266; SNG Copenhagen (Thrace) 1089 (same dies); SNG Ashmolean (Thrace) 3767. EF, minor double strike. From the collection of the MoneyMuseum, Zurich. Acquired from Leu, July 1999.
KINGS of PONTOS. Mithradates VI Eupator. Circa 120-63 BC. AV Stater (20.5mm, 8.29 g, 12h). First Mithradatic War issue. In the name and types of Lysimachos of Thrace. Tomis mint. Struck circa 88-86 BC. Diademed head of the deified Alexander right, with horn of Ammon / BASI?EOS ?YSIMAXOY, Athena Nikephoros seated left, left arm resting on shield, spear diagonally in background; TEM to inner left, TO on throne; in exergue, ornate trident left. Callataÿ p. 141, dies D4/R1; AMNG I 2480, pl. XXI, 6 (same dies); SNG Copenhagen (Thrace) 1091 (same dies); SNG Stockholm 839 (same obv. die); SNG Fabricius 308 (same obv. die). EF, typical minor die wear on obverse. From the collection of the MoneyMuseum, Zurich. Acquired from Leu, June 1999.
MYSIA, Kyzikos. Early–mid 4th centuries BC. EL Stater (17mm, 15.71 g). Bearded head right, wearing laurel wreath; below, tunny right / Quadripartite incuse square. Von Fritze I 197; Greenwell 81; SNG France 337 (this coin); SNG von Aulock –; ACGC 965; Boston MFA 1561; Dewing –; Gillet –; Gulbenkian –; Jameson 2207 = Pozzi 2177; Kraay & Hirmer 721; Rosen –. VF, lightly toned. From the Edoardo Levante Collection. Deaccessioned from the Départment des Monnaies, Médailles et Antiques, Bibliothèque Nationale de France.J.P. Six (NC 1898, pp. 197-198) first suggested that the bearded male portrait on this stater was that of the Athenian general Timotheos (d. 354 BC), who had raised the siege of Kyzikos in 363 BC (Diod. Sic. 15.81.6), noting a similarity between the coins and a marble portrait in the Capitoline Museum (no. 46). Other authors subsequently took different views. However, in "The Cyzicenes: A Reappraisal," AJN 5-6 [1993-1994], pp. 9-11, Mildenberg defended Six`s hypothesis. He noted that Kyzikos was under Persian control from 540 BC until 445 BC, and then from 387 BC until the end of the Achaemenid Empire. During the almost sixty year interval, Kyzikos was allied with Athens as a member of the Delian League. Kyzikos, however, was not banned from continuing to strike electrum staters (per League rules), because Athens saw the coinage as a valuable means of payment and in its best interest. Thus, when Athenian forces under the command of Timotheos successfully raised the Persian siege of Kyzikos in 363 BC (Diod. Sic. 15.81.6), the citizens placed the portrait of the victorious general, complete with laurel wreath, on this issue of staters to show their appreciation of his services and subtly honor him in an already-accepted Athenian associated context.Timotheos was the son of Konon and a Thracian mother (Ath. 13.577a). A prominent citizen, Timotheos was an associate of both the philosopher Plato and the Athenian orator Isokrates. Between 378 BC and 356 BC he frequently served as strategos, in which capacity he was able to secure an Athenian alliance with Kephallenia, and friendship with the Akarnanians and the Molossians. In 373 BC he was assigned command of a fleet to relieve Korkyra from Spartan control. Because the expedition was underfunded, the relief was delayed, prompting Timotheos to be brought to trial. Through the intervention of his allies, including Jason, the ruler of Pherai and the tagos (ta???) of the Thessalian League, Timotheos was acquitted. Following his acquittal, and with the assistance of Amyntas III of Macedon, Timotheos took Korkyra (Diod. Sic. 15.47). For this, a statue was raised in his honor in Athens (Aeschin. In Ctes. 243). In 363 BC, Timotheos raised the siege of Kyzikos, for which these staters may have been issued (Diod. Sic. 15.81.6). In 366 BC, Timotheos was sent to aid Ariobarzanes, the satrap of Phrygia, but when he discovered that the satrap was in revolt against the Great King, Timotheos turned his attention to the northern Aegean. There, he captured Samos after a siege of 10 months, followed by similar conquests along the Thraco-Macedonian coast. A legal action brought against him by Apollodoros (the speech of which is attributed to Demosthenes), is noteworthy for illustrating the reversal of fortune of the once-great and honored general. Timotheos was once again in command during the Social War (357-355 BC), but competing personalities among the leadership again brought Timotheos to trial. Found guilty and unable to pay the heavy fine imposed on him, Timotheos retreated to Chalkis in Euboia, where he died. In remorse for their treatment of the once-favored general, the Athenians forgave a greater part of the debt that had passed on to his son, Konon. They also brought his ashes back to Athens, burying them in the Keramikos a
MYSIA, Kyzikos. Early–mid 4th centuries BC. EL Stater (16mm, 16.05 g). Bearded head right, wearing ivy wreath; below, tunny left / Quadripartite incuse square. Hurter & Liewald I 23a, illustrating Prinkipo 84 (same dies); otherwise unpublished. Good VF, a few light deposits. Historically interesting and extremely rare with ivy wreath, only three examples known, all from the Prinkipo hoard. Ex Triton XV (3 January 2012), lot 1316 (sold for hammer $50,000, but not paid).J.P. Six (NC 1898, pp. 197-198) first suggested that the bearded male portrait on this stater was that of the Athenian general Timotheos (d. 354 BC), who had raised the siege of Kyzikos in 363 BC (Diod. Sic. 15.81.6), noting a similarity between the coins and a marble portrait in the Capitoline Museum (no. 46). Other authors subsequently took different views. However, in "The Cyzicenes: A Reappraisal," AJN 5-6 [1993-1994], pp. 9-11, Mildenberg defended Six`s hypothesis. He noted that Kyzikos was under Persian control from 540 BC until 445 BC, and then from 387 BC until the end of the Achaemenid Empire. During the almost sixty year interval, Kyzikos was allied with Athens as a member of the Delian League. Kyzikos, however, was not banned from continuing to strike electrum staters (per League rules), because Athens saw the coinage as a valuable means of payment and in its best interest. Thus, when Athenian forces under the command of Timotheos successfully raised the Persian siege of Kyzikos in 363 BC (Diod. Sic. 15.81.6), the citizens placed the portrait of the victorious general, complete with laurel wreath, on this issue of staters to show their appreciation of his services and subtly honor him in an already-accepted Athenian associated context.Timotheos was the son of Konon and a Thracian mother (Ath. 13.577a). A prominent citizen, Timotheos was an associate of both the philosopher Plato and the Athenian orator Isokrates. Between 378 BC and 356 BC he frequently served as strategos, in which capacity he was able to secure an Athenian alliance with Kephallenia, and friendship with the Akarnanians and the Molossians. In 373 BC he was assigned command of a fleet to relieve Korkyra from Spartan control. Because the expedition was underfunded, the relief was delayed, prompting Timotheos to be brought to trial. Through the intervention of his allies, including Jason, the ruler of Pherai and the tagos (ta???) of the Thessalian League, Timotheos was acquitted. Following his acquittal, and with the assistance of Amyntas III of Macedon, Timotheos took Korkyra (Diod. Sic. 15.47). For this, a statue was raised in his honor in Athens (Aeschin. In Ctes. 243). In 363 BC, Timotheos raised the siege of Kyzikos, for which these staters may have been issued (Diod. Sic. 15.81.6). In 366 BC, Timotheos was sent to aid Ariobarzanes, the satrap of Phrygia, but when he discovered that the satrap was in revolt against the Great King, Timotheos turned his attention to the northern Aegean. There, he captured Samos after a siege of 10 months, followed by similar conquests along the Thraco-Macedonian coast. A legal action brought against him by Apollodoros (the speech of which is attributed to Demosthenes), is noteworthy for illustrating the reversal of fortune of the once-great and honored general. Timotheos was once again in command during the Social War (357-355 BC), but competing personalities among the leadership again brought Timotheos to trial. Found guilty and unable to pay the heavy fine imposed on him, Timotheos retreated to Chalkis in Euboia, where he died. In remorse for their treatment of the once-favored general, the Athenians forgave a greater part of the debt that had passed on to his son, Konon. They also brought his ashes back to Athens, burying them in the Keramikos and erecting statues to him in the Agora and on the Akropolis.
IONIA, Achaemenid Period. Uncertain satrap. Circa 350-333 BC. AR Tetradrachm (23.5mm, 15.19 g). Uncertain mint. Pythagores, magistrate. Persian king, wearing kidaris and kandys, in kneeling-running stance right, holding spear in right hand, bow in left; [?]YTAG-O-P-H[S] around / Incuse rectangle, containing pattern possibly depicting relief map of the hinterland of Ephesos. Johnston, Earliest 1–4 var. (orientation of legend); Meadows, Administration 328 = BMC Ionia p. 323, 1 var. (same); Mildenberg, Münzwesen, Group 6.2, 111 = Pixodarus 1 = Leu 25, lot 165. Near EF, toned, very slight die shift on obverse. Extremely rare, apparently the seventh and finest known, at least four of which are in museum collections (Berlin, London, Munich, and Paris). Johnston has interpreted this remarkable reverse design as a relief map of the hinterland of Ephesos, which would make it the earliest Greek map and first physical relief map known. On the right (north) are the mountains Tmolos and Messogis between the river valleys of the Caÿster and Maeander, to the left of which are three mountain ridges (Madranbaba Dagi, Karincali Dagi, and Akaba Tepesi). Johnston follows Six in suggesting that the coins were probably struck at Ephesos under the Persian general Memnon of Rhodes, circa 336-334 BC, in order to pay his army after he had captured the city, but before his defeat by Alexander at the Battle of Granicus in 334. Some issues have names on the obverse, which Six and Johnston think were city magistrates who authorized some issues for Memnon. However, the theory of Six and Johnston has been the subject of some doubt, most recently by Leo Mildenberg.
IONIA, Achaemenid Period. Uncertain satrap. Circa 350-333 BC. AR Tetradrachm (24.5mm, 15.24 g). Uncertain mint. Persian king, wearing kidaris and kandys, in kneeling-running stance right, holding spear in right hand, bow in left / Incuse rectangle, containing pattern possibly depicting relief map of the hinterland of Ephesos. Johnston, Earliest 5–17; Meadows, Administration 328 var. (legend on obv.); Mildenberg, Münzwesen, Group 6.2; SNG von Aulock 7809; BMC Ionia p. 324, 3 and 6; Hirsch 1528; de Luynes 2902. Near EF, toned, a few light scratches under tone on obverse. Johnston has interpreted this remarkable reverse design as a relief map of the hinterland of Ephesos, which would make it the earliest Greek map and first physical relief map known. On the right (north) are the mountains Tmolos and Messogis between the river valleys of the Caÿster and Maeander, to the left of which are three mountain ridges (Madranbaba Dagi, Karincali Dagi, and Akaba Tepesi). Johnston follows Six in suggesting that the coins were probably struck at Ephesos under the Persian general Memnon of Rhodes, circa 336-334 BC, in order to pay his army after he had captured the city, but before his defeat by Alexander at the Battle of Granicus in 334. Some issues have names on the obverse, which Six and Johnston think were city magistrates who authorized some issues for Memnon. However, the theory of Six and Johnston has been the subject of some doubt, most recently by Leo Mildenberg.
IONIA, Achaemenid Period. Uncertain satrap. Circa 350-333 BC. AR Tetradrachm (21.5mm, 14.75 g). Uncertain mint; De–, magistrate. Persian king, wearing kidaris and kandys, in kneeling-running stance right, holding spear in right hand, bow in left; ?H to left, grain ear to lower right / Incuse rectangle, containing pattern possibly depicting relief map of the hinterland of Ephesos. Johnston, Earliest 30 (same obv. die); Meadows, Administration 328 var. (legend); Mildenberg, Münzwesen, Group 6.2; Traité II 75 (Memnon of Rhodes); BMC Ionia p. 323, 2; Sunrise 71. Good VF, toned, some roughness. From the collection of the MoneyMuseum, Zurich. Ex Leu 76 [Exceptional Private Collection] (27 October 1999), lot 188; Münzen und Medaillen AG 47 (30 November 1972), lot 536.Johnston has interpreted this remarkable reverse design as a relief map of the hinterland of Ephesos, which would make it the earliest Greek map and first physical relief map known. On the right (north) are the mountains Tmolos and Messogis between the river valleys of the Caÿster and Maeander, to the left of which are three mountain ridges (Madranbaba Dagi, Karincali Dagi, and Akaba Tepesi). Johnston follows Six in suggesting that the coins were probably struck at Ephesos under the Persian general Memnon of Rhodes, circa 336-334 BC, in order to pay his army after he had captured the city, but before his defeat by Alexander at the Battle of Granicus in 334. Some issues have names on the obverse, which Six and Johnston think were city magistrates who authorized some issues for Memnon. However, the theory of Six and Johnston has been the subject of some doubt, most recently by Leo Mildenberg.
IONIA, Achaemenid Period. Uncertain satrap. Circa 350-333 BC. AR Drachm (15mm, 3.69 g). Uncertain mint. Persian king, wearing kidaris and kandys, in kneeling-running stance right, holding spear in right hand, bow in left / Incuse rectangle, containing pattern possibly depicting relief map of the hinterland of Ephesos. Unpublished. Near EF, light cleaning marks on reverse. Unique. Johnston has interpreted this remarkable reverse design as a relief map of the hinterland of Ephesos, which would make it the earliest Greek map and first physical relief map known. On the right (north) are the mountains Tmolos and Messogis between the river valleys of the Caÿster and Maeander, to the left of which are three mountain ridges (Madranbaba Dagi, Karincali Dagi, and Akaba Tepesi). Johnston follows Six in suggesting that the coins were probably struck at Ephesos under the Persian general Memnon of Rhodes, circa 336-334 BC, in order to pay his army after he had captured the city, but before his defeat by Alexander at the Battle of Granicus in 334. Some issues have names on the obverse, which Six and Johnston think were city magistrates who authorized some issues for Memnon. However, the theory of Six and Johnston has been the subject of some doubt, most recently by Leo Mildenberg.
KINGS of LYDIA. Kroisos. Circa 564/53-550/39 BC. AV Stater (16mm, 10.76 g). Heavy series. Sardes mint. Prototype issue. Confronted foreparts of lion, with sun on forehead, and bull / Two incuse squares. Berk 1; Konuk & Lorber fig. 25 = CH VIII, pl. I, Hoard 7, no. 40; Athena Fund I 58; McClean 8635; NAIM-BAN 6; Ward 723; DDTP p. 11 = AdG p. 43 (this coin). Good VF, a couple tiny scuffs. Extremely rare, one of eleven known examples of this important issue. From the collection of the MoneyMuseum, Zurich. Ex Sotheby’s (8 July 1996), lot 69.The `Kroisos` type coinage is one of the most recognizable of all ancient Greek coinage. All of the issues in the bimetallic, gold and silver, series feature the same confronted lion and bull foreparts on the obverse, and two incuse punches (or a single punch in the case of small denominations) on the reverse. It is thought that the series began on a `heavy` standard, with gold and silver staters of equal weight, around 10.6-10.7 grams, which was later reduced to about 8.17 grams for the gold. More recently, though, studies have shown that coins of both standards circulated together, but that the heavy standard was only used for a relatively short time compared to the light standard, which continued to be used into the Persian period. The Kroiseids have also traditionally been broken down into two stylistic groups, `realistic` and `stylized`, with hoard evidence suggesting that the former belonged to the time of Kroisos, while the latter were of the time of the Persians. The present coin, however, is from an issue that constitutes a third group that has a more archaic style, which has features that suggest it is the first issue of Kroisos` bimetallic coinage. This prototype issue was first noted and analyzed in an article by Paolo Naster in 1964 ("Une série aberrante de Créséides" in BSFN 19 (1964), pp. 364–5, reprinted in P. Naster, Scripta Nummaria: Contributions à la méthodologie numismatique [Louvian-la-Neuve, 1983], pp. 76–7). The archaic character of the type is most evident in the bull, where the fine waves of hair on the later coinage is here represented as a series of pelleted lines emanating from a solid arc that forms the animal`s neckline. At the same time, antecedents of the style of the lion can be seen in the earlier electum coinage, particularly the hemihektai of Wiedauer`s Group XVI. The most significant feature linking this issue to the electrum, though, is the appearance of the small pellet or protuberance on the head of the lion. This feature, usually featuring rays emanating from it, is canonical on all the earlier electrum coinage from the time of Ardys until the early part of Kroisos` reign. It is a feature that is totally lacking on the bimetallic coinage of the `realistic` and, later, `stylized` character. A final unusual feature particular to this issue is the depiction of the arms of the lion and bull, which are shown bent nearly 90 degrees at their mid-point, rather than in a straight line from shoulder to paw and hoof.The extreme rarity today of coins of this early style also suggests that this issue was short-lived, perhaps a trial run before the style was standardized. This unusual series was also noted by Martin Price ("Croesus or Pseudo-Croesus?" in Festschrift Mildenberg, p. 221, n. 25), who likewise placed them between the electrum and the gold of standard style. There are currently thirteen known examples of this issue – twelve staters and, possibly, one trite (third stater). The trite has the same unusual bent arms on the lion and bull, but lacks the protuberance on the lion`s head and the style of the bull is identical to that on the `realistic` style issues. A die study was not conducted on these pieces, as the illustrations of most prevent an accurate analysis. In the only attempted die stud
SELEUKID KINGS of SYRIA. Antiochos V Eupator. 164-162 BC. AR Tetradrachm (32mm, 16.18 g, 1h). Ptolemaïs (Ake) mint. Struck 164 BC. Diademed head of Antiochos V as a young child right; AY monogram to left / BASI?EOS ANTIOXOY, Apollo Delphios seated left on omphalos, testing arrow in his right hand, left hand on bow set on ground to right; AY monogram to outer left, NE monogram to outer right, ?B and HP monograms in exergue. SC 1581a = Houghton & Le Rider II 1 (D1/R1) = CSE 772 (this coin); HGC 9, 751b. Superb EF, toned, hairline flan crack. Very rare, and among the finest known. Ex Numismatica Genevensis SA V (2 December 2008), lot 139; Arthur Houghton Collection (Numismatic Fine Arts XVIII, 31 March 1987), lot 335.The unusually youthful portrait on this very rare issue of Ptolemaïs led Houghton and Le Rider to speculate that these tetradrachms may belong to a coregency of Antiochos IV and V during the former`s eastern campaign. The absense of the title Eypator from this issue, which would have been assumed by Antiochos V at the time of his father`s death, suggests this issue was struck when Antiochos IV was still living. While Antiochos IV was in the east, Lycias, the Seleukid vice regent, was campaigning in Judaea to put down the revolt of the Maccabees, and it is possible that he required coinage to be produced at the mint of Ptolemaïs for this purpose. Interestingly, the monogram on the obverse of this issue, which is different from all other obverse controls at Ptolemaïs, could be resolved as the first letters of Lysias`s name.
JUDAEA, Bar Kochba Revolt. 132-135 CE. AR Sela – Tetradrachm (26mm, 14.65 g, 1h). Dated year 2 (133/4 CE). Façade of the Temple at Jerusalem; showbread table within, “Jerusalem” (in Hebrew) around / Bundle of lulav; etrog to left, “Y(ear) 2 of the Freedom of Israel” (in Hebrew) around. Mildenberg 8 (O1/R7); Meshorer 229 (same obv. die as illustration); Hendin 1385 (same obv. die as illustration); Bromberg 80 (same obv. die); Shoshana I 20255 = C. Samuels, P. Rynearson, & Y. Meshorer, The Numismatic Legacy of the Jews as Depicted by A Distinguished American Collection (New York, 2000), 105 (this coin); Sofaer 29 (same obv. die); Spaer 188 (same dies); SNG ANS 517 (same dies). Superb EF, underlying luster, a touch of die wear on obverse. Sharply struck on a broad flan. Very rare year 1/2 hybrid, the finest known. Ex Shoshana Collection (Part I, Heritage, 8 March 2012), lot 20255.As noted in Hendin, the first selas of year 2 were struck using the same obverse die that had been used on all the year 1 selas, and are thus considered hybrids. Another carryover from the first year is the more broadly formed flan that extends well beyond the edge of the dies.
KYRENAICA, Kyrene. temp. Magas. As Ptolemaic governor, first reign, circa 300-282/75 BC. AR Didrachm (21mm, 6.74 g, 12h). Head of Apollo right, wearing myrtle wreath / Silphion plant; KY-PA across upper field, monogram to lower left, crab to lower right. SNG Copenhagen –; BMC 265 (same obv. die); Hunterian 573 (same dies); Rhousopoulos 4606. Good VF, attractively toned, overstruck on similar type (on opposing sides). Rare. From the collection of the MoneyMuseum, Zurich. Ex Leu 74 (19 October 1998), lot 300; Schweizerischer Bankverein 21 (24 January 1989), lot 77; John Ward Collection – Metropolitan Museum of Art (Sotheby`s Zurich, 4 April 1973), lot 759; Sir Arthur Evans Collection [“The Collection of an Archaeologist and Traveller”] (Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge, 20 January 1898), lot 144.

-
596780 item(s)/page