Lot

150

OTTOMAN, SULAYMAN I (926-974h), Sultani, Khudayda (?) 937h. WEIGHT: 3.52g. REFERENCES: Pere 174,

In Important Coins of the Islamic World

This auction is live! You need to be registered and approved to bid at this auction.
You have been outbid. For the best chance of winning, increase your maximum bid.
Your bid or registration is pending approval with the auctioneer. Please check your email account for more details.
Unfortunately, your registration has been declined by the auctioneer. You can contact the auctioneer on +44 (0)20 7493 5344 for more information.
You are the current highest bidder! To be sure to win, log in for the live auction broadcast on or increase your max bid.
Leave a bid now! Your registration has been successful.
Sorry, bidding has ended on this item. We have thousands of new lots everyday, start a new search.
Bidding on this auction has not started. Please register now so you are approved to bid when auction starts.
OTTOMAN, SULAYMAN I (926-974h), Sultani, Khudayda (?) 937h.  WEIGHT: 3.52g.  REFERENCES: Pere 174,
Interested in the price of this lot?
Subscribe to the price guide
London
OTTOMAN, SULAYMAN I (926-974h), Sultani, Khudayda (?) 937h. WEIGHT: 3.52g. REFERENCES: Pere 174, same dies; Album A1118; cf Zeno 9117. CONDITION: Minor edge marks, otherwise good very fine and extremely rare. NOTE: Khudayda (modern Arabic al-Hudayda) was a port city on the west coast of Yemen. This coin is struck from the same dies as the piece which Pere attributed to Khudayda, and is stylistically very similar to the example illustrated on Zeno. The date is, unfortunately, ambiguous; comparison with the Zeno specimen suggests that the first digit is an open-topped ‘9’ and the second a ‘3’ rather than an elongated ‘2’, but the unit of the date is difficult to read. Close inspection shows that it is not simply a ‘1’ but that there is another line extending to the right, almost parallel with the rim of the coin to make a ‘7’. Diler (p. 519) listed several Ottoman coins which have been assigned to this mint, which he discussed in some detail. He evidently believed the mint-name to be spurious and based on a number of misreadings. In some cases, he was surely right – he noted that it is impossible for Ottoman coins to have been issued at Khudayda before 932h for historical reasons, and so the coins of Selim I (918-926h) assigned to Khudayda must certainly be misattributed. But it is less easy to dismiss sultanis of Khudayda in this way, given that the Zeno specimen appears to be dated 936h, while the year on the present coin seems best read as 937h. Moreover, Diler’s further observation that coins attributed to Khudayda seem not to have a Yemeni provenance is to some extent irrelevant, especially where ‘Khudayda’ can be shown on historical grounds to be a misreading. In these cases the coin in question had no connection with the Yemen in the first place and one would hardly expect it to be found there. Khudayda is in any case a port town, so it would hardly be surprising if any gold coins in particular struck there may have travelled overseas. The main Ottoman Yemeni mint at this time was located at Zabid, where sultanis were struck in various years between 932h and 962h. All carry the actual year of issue rather than the Sultan’s accessional year, a feature which they share with the present coin and the Zeno specimen. This is in contrast with sultanis from the mint of Jazira, a mint-name which Diler correctly notes would be written with similar letter-forms to Khudayda; these appear to be known dated 926h only. Diler also points out that the mint-name could be read as ‘Jadida’, and claims that ‘there were at least 7 localities called al-Jedeide in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, which would have been written like al-Khudayda but with a diacritical point under the first letter.’ But the only one of these which Diler himself records as a mint is not recorded as having issued Ottoman coins, and seems only to have been active under the Golden Horde (Diler p. 428). So a hypothetical ‘Jadida’ or ‘Jedeide’ would equally be an unpublished mint and, as Diler himself notes ‘…it is very easy to attribute a coin to a locality but extremely difficult to disprove it.’
OTTOMAN, SULAYMAN I (926-974h), Sultani, Khudayda (?) 937h. WEIGHT: 3.52g. REFERENCES: Pere 174, same dies; Album A1118; cf Zeno 9117. CONDITION: Minor edge marks, otherwise good very fine and extremely rare. NOTE: Khudayda (modern Arabic al-Hudayda) was a port city on the west coast of Yemen. This coin is struck from the same dies as the piece which Pere attributed to Khudayda, and is stylistically very similar to the example illustrated on Zeno. The date is, unfortunately, ambiguous; comparison with the Zeno specimen suggests that the first digit is an open-topped ‘9’ and the second a ‘3’ rather than an elongated ‘2’, but the unit of the date is difficult to read. Close inspection shows that it is not simply a ‘1’ but that there is another line extending to the right, almost parallel with the rim of the coin to make a ‘7’. Diler (p. 519) listed several Ottoman coins which have been assigned to this mint, which he discussed in some detail. He evidently believed the mint-name to be spurious and based on a number of misreadings. In some cases, he was surely right – he noted that it is impossible for Ottoman coins to have been issued at Khudayda before 932h for historical reasons, and so the coins of Selim I (918-926h) assigned to Khudayda must certainly be misattributed. But it is less easy to dismiss sultanis of Khudayda in this way, given that the Zeno specimen appears to be dated 936h, while the year on the present coin seems best read as 937h. Moreover, Diler’s further observation that coins attributed to Khudayda seem not to have a Yemeni provenance is to some extent irrelevant, especially where ‘Khudayda’ can be shown on historical grounds to be a misreading. In these cases the coin in question had no connection with the Yemen in the first place and one would hardly expect it to be found there. Khudayda is in any case a port town, so it would hardly be surprising if any gold coins in particular struck there may have travelled overseas. The main Ottoman Yemeni mint at this time was located at Zabid, where sultanis were struck in various years between 932h and 962h. All carry the actual year of issue rather than the Sultan’s accessional year, a feature which they share with the present coin and the Zeno specimen. This is in contrast with sultanis from the mint of Jazira, a mint-name which Diler correctly notes would be written with similar letter-forms to Khudayda; these appear to be known dated 926h only. Diler also points out that the mint-name could be read as ‘Jadida’, and claims that ‘there were at least 7 localities called al-Jedeide in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, which would have been written like al-Khudayda but with a diacritical point under the first letter.’ But the only one of these which Diler himself records as a mint is not recorded as having issued Ottoman coins, and seems only to have been active under the Golden Horde (Diler p. 428). So a hypothetical ‘Jadida’ or ‘Jedeide’ would equally be an unpublished mint and, as Diler himself notes ‘…it is very easy to attribute a coin to a locality but extremely difficult to disprove it.’

Important Coins of the Islamic World

Sale Date(s)
Venue Address
Sotheby's
Upper Grosvenor Gallery
The Aeolian Hall, Bloomfield Place
New Bond Street
London
W1A 2AA
United Kingdom

For Morton & Eden Ltd. delivery information please telephone +44 (0)20 7493 5344.

Important Information

All questions and comments relating to the operation of this sale or to its content should be addressed to Morton & Eden Ltd and not to Sotheby’s. 

Public viewing:

Nash House, St George Street, London W1S 2FQ

Monday 20 April 10.00am to 4.30pm

Tuesday 21 April 10.00am to 4.30pm

Wednesday 22 April 10.00am to 4.30pm

Online Bidding

This auction can be viewed online at www.the-saleroom.com, www.invaluable.com and www.sixbid.com.

Morton & Eden Ltd offers an online bidding service via www.the-saleroom.com.  This is provided on the understanding that Morton & Eden Ltd shall not be responsible for errors or failures to execute internet bids for reasons including but not limited to: i) a loss of internet connection by either party; ii) a breakdown or other problems with the online bidding software; iii) a breakdown or other problems with your computer, system or internet connection.  All bids placed through www.the-saleroom.com are also subject to our standard Conditions of Business.

In completing the registration on www.the-saleroom.com and providing their credit card details, unless alternative arrangements are agreed with Morton & Eden Ltd, buyers

i) authorise Morton & Eden Ltd, if they so wish, to charge the credit card in part or full payment, including all fees, for items successfully purchased in the auction via www.the-saleroom.com and

ii) confirm that they are authorised to provide these credit card details through www.the-saleroom.com to Morton & Eden Ltd and agree that Morton & Eden Ltd are entitled to ship the goods to the cardholder name and cardholder address provided in fulfilment of the sale.

Important Information for Buyers

All lots are offered subject to Morton & Eden Ltd’s Conditions of Business and to reserves.

Estimates are published as a guide only and are subject to review.  The hammer price of a lot may well be higher or lower than the range of figures given and there are no fixed starting prices.

* Illustrated lots are marked with an asterisk.  Images of additional items not illustrated in the printed catalogue are available online.

A Buyer’s Premium of 20% is applicable to all lots in this sale and is subject to VAT at the standard rate (currently 20%).  Unless otherwise indicated, lots are offered for sale under the Auctioneer’s Margin Scheme.

‡ Lots marked with a double dagger symbol have been imported from outside the European Union (EU) to be sold at auction under Temporary Admission Rules.  When released to buyers within the EU, the buyer becomes the importer and must pay import VAT (currently 5%) on the hammer price.

VAT may be refunded to buyers from outside the EU under certain circumstances and if satisfactory evidence of export is produced within three months of the date of sale.

Morton & Eden Ltd can obtain quotations for the shipping of purchases and assist in applying for export licences.  However buyers are reminded that it is their responsibility to comply with UK export regulations and with any local import requirements.

Morton & Eden Ltd will be pleased to execute bids on behalf of those clients unable to attend the sale in person, subject to our Conditions of Business.  Lots will always be purchased as cheaply as possible, depending on any other bids and reserves.  This service is offered free of charge.  

Written bids should be submitted before 6pm on the day prior to the sale. 

Payment Instructions

Payment must be made in pounds sterling and is due at the conclusion of the sale and before purchases can be released.

Bank Transfers:

Please quote your name and invoice number with the instructions to the bank.

Cheques and banker’s drafts should be drawn on a UK bank.  We require seven days to clear cheques unless special arrangements have been made in advance of the sale. 

Please note foreign cheques will not be accepted.

Credit and Debit Cards.  All credit and non-UK debit card payments are subject to a surcharge of 2%. 

Sterling Cash.  Subject to statutory limits. 

Terms & Conditions

See Full Terms And Conditions